home
on exploration, introspection and creation

Archive for the ‘puzzle’ Category

Communicating with an Alien Race

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

Let’s assume that there exists other intelligent life somewhere in the Universe. I like to consider the various parameters of the properties of such a life, which would define commonalities between us and them (it), which would help define how we could communicate.

Unsurprisingly, as any topic that tickles our (I’m argue evolutionary!) desire to explore, there has been a lot of thought put into this problem. I’ll do what I do best — start with some of the context I’ve acquired over the years (the Pioneer message, the Arecibo message, a much longer one, or Carl Sagan’s Contact) to see where I can take the idea (a good test of how I’m thinking about it, and possibly a way to think outside the box), and would love to hear from those who know more, or have thought about it, especially if you have differing opinions.

Let’s start with a relatively simple model. An alien race that is based on similar biological mechanisms, thus consisting of individuals that have become intelligent through evolution, that have acquired inter-generational (institutional) memory and thus civilization through some method of communication between individuals. Note that I’m not necessarily assuming many of the aspects of such a life — language (imagine a species that can communicate through some form of telepathy), physical attributes (such a life may be non-carbon based and interact with the environment in wildly different ways than we — for example, be entirely gaseous and receive and generate arbitrary signals along a specific range of electromagnetic spectrum), motivations. Let’s assume, however, that the Universe behaves the same way locally to this alien life form as it does in our environment.

The most interesting aspect in such a case is the mode of communication. What can we assume is common? Nothing physical, for sure. For species that travel in the electromagnetic spectrum (just like light does), our highways and staircases and in general attraction to solid state objects would make very little sense. Instead of trying to start with something most concrete to us, it makes sense to start as broadly as possible. We need a medium and a message.

For the medium, we could use the electromagnetic spectrum. Really, anything we can generate that can travel far, fast, and be distinguishable from everything around us. Don’t be fooled by visible light! — although it’s possible that there is some cosmic law that makes visible light frequencies be a local maximum along some dimension — the energy required to receive it relative to its usefulness in the surrounding environment (seeing X-rays instead of “visible” light would not be all that helpful to early humans) — this is highly dependent on the initial conditions of life. Or maybe it’s a fluke. More generally, anything that generates a force field, though it’s harder to generate ripples in the gravitational field as easily as it is to blast electromagnetic messages. Quantum effects are likely too small to be noticed, although I don’t really know anymore, given all these spooky things happening.

The message? Non-random (non-chaotic), but not too regular (pulsars send out regular messages out in the space). Taking both together, it’s a pretty natural thing to mimic the universe around us — assuming that what we observe of distant stars from Earth, the aliens can also observe from their vantage point — but provide patterns whose complexity is a tad higher than the complexity of similar messages generated by the Universe itself. Prime numbers are good candidates — and in general, anything that is really fundamental and to do with mathematics, because it’s very likely that an alien race knows mathematics (as the study of patterns, totally abstracted from the source of these patterns). Unitless quantities are better than something with an intrinsic measure, because the fewer assumptions, the better.

Can an alien race be sophisticated enough to be able to receive our communication, and interesting enough to talk to, but not understand at least some form of mathematics? Could an alien special have developed (not been born with!) interstellar travel and not understood binary systems. Science fiction scenarios aside (an alien species is decimated along with its cultural heritage and ends up traveling across solar systems without the knowledge of how its machines take it thus far), I think there is universal consensus that the answer is no. And in fact, an ability to think abstractly is very likely a sign of intelligence. But this does not hold the other way — I can imagine a race that is either so sophisticated as to think of mathematics the same way we think about the pulses of Nature and simply ignore any such signal, or so intuitive that they don’t identify mathematics as a discipline. For the former, introducing some obvious and non-obvious error in the message might be a great solution. A race that can enumerate prime numbers is intelligent, but a race that makes a mistake early on must be much more street smart!

But even assuming an alien race does understand the concept of binary arithmetic, it may not be able to understand its encoding. Would a series of dots and dashes in a column corresponding to the numerals necessarily be informational? Not if the aliens don’t have spacial awareness. Would a series of beeps be a good encoding? Not if the aliens can’t hear or — more interestingly — don’t have a notion of time (or cause-and-effect).

Math aside, the fundamental laws of the Universe would probably be a common base, although one can imagine a less curious (or much more sophisticated and thus thinking of the laws of the Universe as irrelevant) life form, or a more precise one where our crude approximations of the Universe map to something incomprehensible to them. We can ask astronomy what quantities are pervasive and communicate their ratios. This is what Pioneer and the Arecibo messages were, and it is a great way to communicate our relative knowledge of the universe with the above assumptions in mind.

There are alternatives to this model that would work similarly in some aspects. Consider a species that is a single individual (instead of many individuals that communicate with one another and thus pass the knowledge). Such an individual may not comprehend the notion of individuality, but may still be able to communicate with us the same way, definitely remotely, where we can approximate mankind as a single individual, at least in the beginning of the dialogue. If their Universe doesn’t behave the same way as ours does (say, the speed of light, due to some quirkiness, is infinite in some valley of the Universe), if the alien race can perceive the different laws elsewhere, they can still compare our crazy patterns of high entropy to the surrounding comparative dead silence. Though such an alien race may not be particularly useful to talk with (if they have no insight that can be understood by us).

The concept of communicating with an alien race is a fascinating one. Clearly, there is no way to think about it in the most abstract way — there are always assumptions that we must accept. Let’s hope that we’ll get to tackle this problem at some point in the near future, and let’s hope that we get some of our assumptions right — we wouldn’t want to miss an alien race that happens to be intelligent in a different way. Or be trampled by one in search of intelligent life.

To See the Future

Tuesday, July 19th, 2011

If you could see the future, how would such an ability manifest itself? How would you describe “seeing” the future, especially given that the future is much less one image as a superposition of an infinite number of probable images? How do we take into account the “observer” effect — where the future of some events drastically depends on what the one seeing it decides to do in the next few seconds?

I imagine that seeing the future would be just like seeing in a classical sense, with a few exceptions. First, you could focus on some time in the future (just like you focus on a particular element in your field of vision) and that would reveal the state of reality in that point in the future. It would be pinpoint-, but not distance-accurate (just like focusing is): you can focus on a particular existing element well and almost instantaneously, no matter how close or far it is, but you couldn’t focus on an element at a particular distance. Similarly, when seeing the future, you would be able to focus on a particular event, but not necessarily on a particular point in time (and you would only know by and large what time this event is going to happen).

Moreover–and more importantly–possibilities in the future would manifest themselves as blurry spots. If something was a certainty, you would see it as sharp and distinct. If something was a possibility, it would blur with the other possible outcomes. For example, the sun rising tomorrow is a certainty so as you focus on the event of the run rising tomorrow you would see it sharp and distinct. But, say, your dog might be hit by a car in a week so it would appear in your visions of the subsequent future as blurry. The further out you “focus”, the more blurry it will be.

This model comes to a beautiful conclusion in the case of the above mentioned “observer” effect. As you focus on the future event that depends heavily on a decision you make, the details in the event will shift from blurry to more defined as you think more or less heavily of making one decision relative to the other. In a way, you will be able to “focus” your vision of the future by committing to certain decisions.

A Macro-scale Observer Effect

Wednesday, May 11th, 2011

My brother came to the U.S. to visit me a couple of years back. I was excited to show him what kind of life I lead, give him a glimpse of the crazy activities I participate in. But as the days went by with him here, I found that to my surprise he wasn’t experiencing what I would describe as my “real” life.

Just as he was leaving, I realized that my brother would never have been able to know what my life was like. His stay was an example of an Observer Effect at a macro scale — my brother’s presence made me (and others) behave very differently than we would have otherwise. It wasn’t deliberate (since I was actually looking forward to showing my brother the real me), but by necessity his presence influenced the experiment.

This is interesting to me because it’s an example of an Observer Effect applied to an everyday situation, a very real one. You don’t have to go down to quantum scale to note it — it affects us all the time. Trying harder (like I was, saying to myself prior to my brother’s arrival, that I will be as “natural” as I can be) simply doesn’t work. So instead of fighting this fact of life, let’s simply learn to acknowledge it.

On Information

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011

We live in an age of information hoarding. Data never gets deleted, and every year it gets more and more easy to replicate. What used to take six months, a literate monk and a heavy volume now takes a fraction of a second, a child and a drive the size of a pin.

How will this information be used by future societies? For anything other than pure speculation, we should refer to history to see themes and patterns from the past.

The Romans–one of several civilizations whose society was probably as sophisticated as ours is today before its decline–were capable of recording information, even though it was more expensive. Then why do we know so little about them, relatively to what we would hope to know? Were the Romans one of the cultures that decided to reduce the amount of information they generate for some reason (I could imagine in the near future that our society would have a culture of information reticence, where larger and larger hard drives are simply not needed just like more than one computer mouse is useless to us now)? Is this information simply irrelevant to us because it happened so long ago so over time we chose to obliterate it? Does information naturally degrade regardless of the society’s attempts to preserve it?

Life expectancy and the desire for peace

Monday, May 9th, 2011

Is there a relationship between life expectancy in a society and its desire to maintain peace? Could it be that the younger the population, the more temperamental it is and so the more likely it is to wage wars?

Or is being peaceloving a trait that comes with the sophistication of a society brought about by greater literacy, education, and made possible with better health and nutrition?

Or is it simply a fluke and future generations will be just as violent as the prior ones have been?

The Puzzles of the Face

Thursday, January 20th, 2011

It’s remarkable how much better we are at recognizing faces and facial expressions at any other kind of patterns. On an evolutionary level this allows for the children to recognize their mother and other peoples’ intentions, which is beneficial to survival. Our ability to differentiate between different facial features (and the fact that there is no obvious metrics for which face we would find more aesthetically pleasing) allows for greater diversity and thus more efficient selection.

And what about our ability to determine with remarkably great precision when another individual’s eyes are pointed at us? How is that advantageous?

What is a Nightmare

Thursday, January 6th, 2011

I had a nightmare a few weeks ago. It was a very strange dream. It was obviously surreal but at the time (as it always is the case for me) I didn’t realize I was dreaming. However, I felt that something frightening was going to happen. It seemed to me that the characters in the dream tried to catch me off guard and attack me in a way that usually makes me wake up sweating. I had a feeling of looming evil.

Eventually one of the characters in the dream did attack me; it filled me with a deeply unsettling feeling of fear and panic. It wasn’t physically scary; I didn’t even know what happened. All there was was that feeling of evil, and with it, my uneasiness, shock, fright. I woke up suddenly.

Is a nightmare an abstract manifestation of our fears?

Nav Systems and Early Turns

Wednesday, December 1st, 2010

I used to own a nav system in my car and I noticed that as it gave me directions, it would strongly prefer turning early. Why is this? I settled on the following two reasons:

  • The characteristics of the search that is being employed — the search could branch out early because most often, when you ask for directions you have to change the general direction in which you’re heading
  • If you are going to miss the turns, it’s better to miss the earlier ones. It gives you greater flexibility in still getting to your destination. In other words, it’s better to have the option to turn early — turn if you can, because if you can’t, you can go straight and delay turning for later. If you prefer not turning early, you may end up not having an option to turn anymore, which will mean you’re likely to stop more frequently towards the end of the trip

A Recession Special!

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

I’ve seen these around a year back or so in the windows of some shops. This reflexivity of the retail industry struck me as strange. Was the industry just as aware of the previous recessions as they were happening? Or was it simply not yet so exploitative of them?

It’s probably the latter: companies find themselves having to find more and more elaborate and complex ways to draw in the customer, and taking advantage of the overall mood of the consumers seems just another in the series of such tricks.

Evolution’s Important Assumption

Monday, October 25th, 2010

It’s pretty obvious to me that evolution–the phenomenon of a gradual and inter-generational increase in the individuals’ ability to survive through the selection bias of mutations of their genetic make-up.

But one thing I don’t understand. Evolution (and thus the underlying natural selection) assumes that the individuals have the desire to live. Why? Why is it more advantageous to live than not to live? I can see that in intelligent species, the desire to live is a natural consequence of consciousness: I am aware of my existence and so I do not want to cease to exist. But what about all other species?