We live in an age of information hoarding. Data never gets deleted, and every year it gets more and more easy to replicate. What used to take six months, a literate monk and a heavy volume now takes a fraction of a second, a child and a drive the size of a pin.
How will this information be used by future societies? For anything other than pure speculation, we should refer to history to see themes and patterns from the past.
The Romans–one of several civilizations whose society was probably as sophisticated as ours is today before its decline–were capable of recording information, even though it was more expensive. Then why do we know so little about them, relatively to what we would hope to know? Were the Romans one of the cultures that decided to reduce the amount of information they generate for some reason (I could imagine in the near future that our society would have a culture of information reticence, where larger and larger hard drives are simply not needed just like more than one computer mouse is useless to us now)? Is this information simply irrelevant to us because it happened so long ago so over time we chose to obliterate it? Does information naturally degrade regardless of the society’s attempts to preserve it?




elevenseconds.com
blog.elevenseconds is powered by